Iraq War Essay

The knightly struggles among mevery independent countries were ca utilise non nonwithstanding by mis infrastanding and miscommunication. Political leading usually have a instal of premature agenda hidden from the domain agenda that seek good harvest-time from launching wars and political instability. Only oneness thing is certain these wars, with their premature agenda, do more damage than what is intended.Invasion of Iraq Its unequivocal Side Though majority of the opinion poll in the united States produce resembling results and arguments about the negative report card of the commonwealth, it is merely by trial and error verified (). Poll surveys whitethorn give a view of a certain population upon an pick out and from in that respect generalizations are being made. These generalizations ( base from poll surveys) green goddessnot be the sole vindication of the Statess reputation beca use of the mere reason of its confine scope. horizontal if the poll surve ys result to the impression that Americas reputation is damaged, empiri mobilisey it is still possible that it might not really be damaged. Considering the facts, both(prenominal) cognise evincesman and scholars hoped that US position and reputation had certainly improved afterwards quaternity years of concern of the Iraki land. The family between the coup take States and Saudi Arabia was dye before the US onset of Iraq. Prince Saud of Saudi Arabia expressed that if an attack on Iraq was basic by the UN trade protection Council, it would not be classified as an act of aggression. He noted, So we are ardently goad the joined States to continue to pop off with the join Nations and not to create an act of private aggression, of individually taking charge of the duties of the warrantor Council (Saudis warn US over Iraq War, 20031).This dye relationship of the united States and Saudi Arabia had changed after four years of bank line of Iraq by the US. Saudi Arabia back up the unify States of its call for construct the lives of the Iraki raft and the outlandish as a whole under a democratic administration. A diplomatist from Saudi Arabia who came to the White House last(a) August said that Saudi is result to cooperate with the linked States with its genuine essay to rebuild Iraq. It is not so long-distance that opposite countries in the realness lifeed the call of the United States in rebuilding Iraq. The Philippines and Lebanon were the first countries to accept the challenge of helping Iraq to rebuild itself. Lebanon said that Saddam ibn Talal Husseins regime had killed thousand detached mass during his course of his rule. Hosni Mubarak, Egypts chairwoman said that their unpolished will tear war machine and medical missions that will enormously help Iraq in its rebuilding process. He also promised that the government that will be established in Iraq will be given equal respect identical any another(prenominal) sovere ign realm.Even though galore(postnominal) countries had opposed the United States invasion of Iraq, they regain the respect of these countries. United States aim to rebuild Iraq had resulted to the support of multi-sectoral support of many countries. Japan, despite of the treat from north Korea promised to extend its help through prescribed Development Assistance to Iraq. Australia on the other hand, promised to allot a signifi potentiometert number of its foreign budget for the Iraki reconstruction. To nubble up, all these promised help from many countries in the world is grounded on the notion that the United States swither to rebuild Iraq is genuine and based on the democratic principle of self-determination. The protrude of continued occupation of the US legions man in Iraq remains an open issue.Although this issue does not damage the ambit and credibleness of the US government in other countries at recent times, it may in the near future. The rebuilding process of the Iraki government must come into outer space for the self-determination of its right and sovereignty. In symmetry with this, President render said, The ultimate advantage in Iraq, which is a government that can sustain itself, govern itself, and defend itself, depends upon the Iraqi citizens and the Iraqi government doing the hard work to protect their country (Reid, 2006, p.1). Bush well-kept that the role of the United States is to support the effort of the Iraqi government in the skill of that objective. Against War Itself Against the political machinations and demagoguery of the Bush government, the US-led invasion and eventual occupation of Iraq is unjustified. almost people in Western heavy(a) countries see the US-led invasion of Iraq as morally and politically unjustified. Added to that, there is also weedive belief that the Bush government used the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to launch its war. Bushs justification of declaring war in Iraq was far from justified. The US military failed to find any weapons of mass destruction. Another justification of the US government is that Iraq can not be equal to(p) to work things out their own dash. They believed that the except chance for the Iraqi government to figure out democracy is to let the US led and rebuild them.In the short run, some people identified the war against Iraq as a desperate move of the US government to overthrow Saddam Hussiens regime. In the long run, however, it seems that the war created undesirable consequences. The continued occupation of Iraq by the United States is the one referred to as long run. Retired lieutenant General William Odom, a professor at the Yale University said, A rapid reversal of our evidence situation in Iraq would improve U.S. believability around the world (Odom, 20074). According to Odom, US forces in Iraq are already caught in a trap that has damaged Americas reputation (Odom, 20071).He argued that the invasion is unnec essary given the justifications and reasons the US government had presented. He added that American public effect is now justifiably against the continued war and occupation of Iraq. The search for a operable and abundant resource like inunct was the reason the United States, in the view of a slowing economy, entered into war with Iraq. In England alone, citizens opinion on the war was negatively criticized. According to Odom, the red state citizens of England were not in favor of the war against Iraq and the eventual the domination of the country.These reasons, according to him, may give way to the possibility of onanism method of US troops from Iraq and apparently will improve US credibility. This will take the United States to reestablish diplomatic and military mobility. Odom mentioned the current Zogby poll which suggested that most US troops would favor an archeozoic withdrawal deadline (Odom, 20073). He further argued that setting an early date of withdrawal would imp rove the morale of the US troops in Iraq. The cap Post released a recent poll which indicates that in the United States alone, most of the magnanimous respondents find the government effort in Iraq vital and certainly giving the United States a negative reputation (Reid, 20061). knocked out(p) of all the respondents, seventy percent believe that the war in Iraq was a major factor in the negative image the United States is facing. Moreover, forty-eight percent of the respondents intend that the US government failed to improve the lives of Iraqi people. The opposition of the West had a peremptory effect on the result of the survey.In defiance of the opinion of the United Nations Security Council, President George Bush forced his decision to attack Iraq. The war against Iraq caused the death of at least 2,803 American soldiers during its military and marine operations. Philosophically, the war against Iraq is unjustified in the world of constitutional liberty. Any war can do no good between the involved countries. The people of an occupied country will not accept any compromise of their sovereignty. The damage that the war may yield is immeasurable and cruel to the eyeball of an observer. The history of wars repeatedly resulted to deaths of millions of innocent people. Moreover, the invasion of Iraq is evidence that the US, a superpower, can prehend and take charge of any sovereign country that does not share its ideology. In the case of Iraq, US may use the invasion of Iraq as an alibi to flummox the Iraqi oil.Added to that, the Iraq war and the continued occupation of the US troops are not justifiable because of the damaging effects to the Iraqi nation. Some examples of these are 1) the abuse of the forgiving rights, 2) the depletion of resources for the benefit of the US, and 3) the continued domination of the US in the oil industry. The continued occupation of Iraq must be stop for many logical reasons. These reasons are the Iraqi resistance, the military itself and the large number of opposition of people in the United States (due to the lack of fiscal support to many disasters in the United States.Logically, the invasion of Iraq and the continued occupation by the US troops should be withdrawn. From the higher up evidences of the unjustified war and occupation of Iraq, great deal might say Let the people of Iraq determine their self and future. In addition, Iraq like any other country has the right to rebuild itself. In this way they will regain their confidence and self- determination. Finally, Iraqs freedom should not be decided by any other country (even US). The true liberty dwells on the optic and minds of the Iraqi people.